By No one can deny the appeal of a film like “Avatar”, especially one that has such massive worldwide media exposure. The film’s success is often attributed to its marketing campaign that was designed to make it seem as if there was no difference between the film’s big budget, big budget, big budget movie and the smaller budget, smaller budget, smaller budget movie. The marketing campaign was one of the films’ biggest selling points.
While Avatar was not as well-known as its other films, the marketing campaign it created was so successful that it made it the number one movie in our top 100 films list for 2010. It also made it number 2 on our list of the top 50 films of 2010. So in case you haven’t been paying attention to the number one movie in the top 100, you’d be missing out on one of the biggest movies of the decade.
The marketing campaign for Avatar was a big deal because it was the first time that anyone had seen a movie that wasn’t the blockbuster blockbuster blockbuster. In the movie, the director of the movie, James Cameron, explained that he wanted to make a movie where a major event happened in the history of the world. He wanted to make a movie that could be seen as the culmination of the greatest story ever told.
Sure, but you have to read between the lines. The movie was supposed to be the culmination of a thousand years of storytelling. The movie was actually the culmination of a one-thousandth of a century of storytelling. Cameron was actually trying to market Avatar as a major event.
“The movie” was actually called Titanic. “Titanic” was the name of the ship that carried the movie to its place in history. “Avatar” was the name of the movie’s main character. “Avatar” was the name of the movie’s hero. “Avatar” was the name of the movie. “Avatar” was the name of the movie. “Avatar” was the name of the movie.
It’s hard to imagine having a thousand stories, but it was worth the effort. It’s not only the movies main character that’s going to win an Oscar, but Cameron didn’t just get it all wrong. He actually made the movie worse than it needed to be. The story of Avatar tells how the main character’s journey in the movie is a series of events that happen in a completely different timeline.
It is the main character of the story in Avatar that got it all wrong. But other than that I can think of no other movie that I think the movie should have been better.
The good news is that Cameron is still very much a movie lover, and he’s not wrong on the whole. He could have made the movie better with better pacing and more character development. But he didn’t, and if you’re going to do something like that, why not just make it a movie, and let the characters be characters in their own movie? The movie is still worth watching, just don’t expect to see some of the best moments of Avatar.
The problem is Cameron has a tendency to make movies with no character development. Yes, the movie was a bit slow, but as a whole, he really doesn’t know much about his characters. He just acts like they can do anything, so the movie will probably end up making the audience mad.
The problem is Cameron’s character-development movies are usually pretty bad. He knows what his characters are like, but he can’t tell us why they are doing that. It’s like he’s a bad director.
Comments